Novak Djokovic, Tommy Robredo, Rafael Nadal, Fernando Verdasco, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga and other tennis stars strutted their stuff at the Rogers Cup Players Party on Sunday. Yes the video includes some Novak Djokovic strip-tease action (and click here for more). Wise move, party planners, to “not allow the pants.”
Here’s hoping Nole gets a pole next year.
Tags: ATP, Djokovic, rogers cup, tennis, Tsonga, US Open Series, Verdasco, Video of the Day
Print
| 
Email
|
|
Share
Loading ...
Fair play to Novak,that fashion show was looking as dull as ditch water until he turned up the heat.I love how he is willing to make a complete ass of himself in public just to add a bit of excitement to the damn thing.I heard they raised a bomb for charity too, so it was all in aid of a good cause.I thought he was so cute in that interview afterwards aswell,i know a lot of people don’t like him and he can be a bit moody on court sometimes but offcourt he always seems really relaxed and friendly to me,so i don’t see why he should necesserily be painted as the bad guy.
Maybe the reason I don’t like him is because he was the one that beat Federer on the Australian Open when Roger had the mono, and his mom was saying that the King is Dead, Long live the King,
that is the main reason I don’t like him. Same reason I don’t like Murray, mainly because he doesn’t want to give credit to Roger, being the best. And Nadal, he is always saying Roger is the best, (Maybe is just an act) but, with uttering the word, it makes him more likable in my mind.
Well….agree about Djokovic’s mom part.but not completely agree about the Murray part….as Murray, after getting beaten at last year’s US open, told Roger that he got beaten by the best player that he has known…….
Well Roger is hardly one that showers praise on his opponent after he loses,in fact i find him quite dismissive(except maybe in the case of Nadal but that’s as far as it stretches).Anyway are we going to keep blaming Nole for something stupid his mother said.And she mightn’t even have said it as serious as that,for all we know the paper could have taken it out of context