<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PETE SAMPRAS THINKS ROGER FEDERER IS THE GREATEST. . .MAYBE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gototennisblog.com/2009/07/15/pete-sampras-thinks-roger-federer-is-the-greatest-maybe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gototennisblog.com/2009/07/15/pete-sampras-thinks-roger-federer-is-the-greatest-maybe/</link>
	<description>Tennis blog. Tennis news. Tennis gossip.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:24:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.gototennisblog.com/2009/07/15/pete-sampras-thinks-roger-federer-is-the-greatest-maybe/#comment-7342</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gototennisblog.com/?p=10369#comment-7342</guid>
		<description>Since most of the GOAT debates are between Federer and Sampras, or perhaps Laver, I will try to imagine Nadal never existed or that he&#039;s not as good as he is. Had Federer defeated Nadal in the finals of 2006 and 2007 French Open, he would have won 2 consecutive GRAND SLAMS. Also had he defeated Nadal in the final of last year&#039;s Wimbledon, together with this years victory, he would have won 7 consecutive Wimbledon titles. And the number would go from 15 to 18. That&#039;s a scary thought. It gives me chill just to think of it. Federer, in my mind, is the true GOAT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since most of the GOAT debates are between Federer and Sampras, or perhaps Laver, I will try to imagine Nadal never existed or that he&#8217;s not as good as he is. Had Federer defeated Nadal in the finals of 2006 and 2007 French Open, he would have won 2 consecutive GRAND SLAMS. Also had he defeated Nadal in the final of last year&#8217;s Wimbledon, together with this years victory, he would have won 7 consecutive Wimbledon titles. And the number would go from 15 to 18. That&#8217;s a scary thought. It gives me chill just to think of it. Federer, in my mind, is the true GOAT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freakyfrites</title>
		<link>http://www.gototennisblog.com/2009/07/15/pete-sampras-thinks-roger-federer-is-the-greatest-maybe/#comment-7028</link>
		<dc:creator>freakyfrites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 21:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gototennisblog.com/?p=10369#comment-7028</guid>
		<description>reformed Fed hater, I should say!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reformed Fed hater, I should say!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freakyfrites</title>
		<link>http://www.gototennisblog.com/2009/07/15/pete-sampras-thinks-roger-federer-is-the-greatest-maybe/#comment-7027</link>
		<dc:creator>freakyfrites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 21:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gototennisblog.com/?p=10369#comment-7027</guid>
		<description>Gracias, FeddyBear! And you know I love your nickname :)

Yes, that&#039;s why Roger is my personal GOAT, too - because I just love, love love, watching him play. And lately, I&#039;ve loved watching him fight for these slams.

I&#039;m sure some people feel the same way about Laver and others who aren&#039;t even on the list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gracias, FeddyBear! And you know I love your nickname <img src='http://www.gototennisblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Yes, that&#8217;s why Roger is my personal GOAT, too &#8211; because I just love, love love, watching him play. And lately, I&#8217;ve loved watching him fight for these slams.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure some people feel the same way about Laver and others who aren&#8217;t even on the list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freakyfrites</title>
		<link>http://www.gototennisblog.com/2009/07/15/pete-sampras-thinks-roger-federer-is-the-greatest-maybe/#comment-7025</link>
		<dc:creator>freakyfrites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 21:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gototennisblog.com/?p=10369#comment-7025</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe it, Dootsiez!!!! A Fed HATER!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe it, Dootsiez!!!! A Fed HATER!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ranjolie</title>
		<link>http://www.gototennisblog.com/2009/07/15/pete-sampras-thinks-roger-federer-is-the-greatest-maybe/#comment-7019</link>
		<dc:creator>ranjolie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gototennisblog.com/?p=10369#comment-7019</guid>
		<description>To me Roger is the GOAT because: 
237 consecutive weeks as number 1.
defended his Wimbledon for 4 consecutive years.
played on the finals of the 4 slams at least on 3 different years.
He is the best on &quot;my book&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me Roger is the GOAT because:<br />
237 consecutive weeks as number 1.<br />
defended his Wimbledon for 4 consecutive years.<br />
played on the finals of the 4 slams at least on 3 different years.<br />
He is the best on &#8220;my book&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FeddyBear</title>
		<link>http://www.gototennisblog.com/2009/07/15/pete-sampras-thinks-roger-federer-is-the-greatest-maybe/#comment-7018</link>
		<dc:creator>FeddyBear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gototennisblog.com/?p=10369#comment-7018</guid>
		<description>freakyfrites, if i forgot to tell you i absolutely love your blog, your humorous and entertaining writing always makes me smile. 

about the GOAT discussion - for me it&#039;s not about the titles, slams or H2H with Rafa - it&#039;s Federer, and only because the absolute mesmerizing beauty of his game. the fluency, the winners count, the grace.... poetry in motion. 

i would be delighted to see him take out that ugly Nadal game, i sure hope in the next couple of years he will find an antidote agains his kryptonite - Nadal&#039;s heavy topspin to the backhan side, and reverse that shameful record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>freakyfrites, if i forgot to tell you i absolutely love your blog, your humorous and entertaining writing always makes me smile. </p>
<p>about the GOAT discussion &#8211; for me it&#8217;s not about the titles, slams or H2H with Rafa &#8211; it&#8217;s Federer, and only because the absolute mesmerizing beauty of his game. the fluency, the winners count, the grace&#8230;. poetry in motion. </p>
<p>i would be delighted to see him take out that ugly Nadal game, i sure hope in the next couple of years he will find an antidote agains his kryptonite &#8211; Nadal&#8217;s heavy topspin to the backhan side, and reverse that shameful record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohan</title>
		<link>http://www.gototennisblog.com/2009/07/15/pete-sampras-thinks-roger-federer-is-the-greatest-maybe/#comment-7017</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gototennisblog.com/?p=10369#comment-7017</guid>
		<description>i think this is the lamest discussion of all time! most tennis legends say that RF is the greatest... why not just go by that then? who are we or any other non pro player(which includes journalists!) to judge RF&#039;s achievements? but when a another pro says anything, that&#039;s ok... because they DO know what it takes to play tennis at the pro level...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think this is the lamest discussion of all time! most tennis legends say that RF is the greatest&#8230; why not just go by that then? who are we or any other non pro player(which includes journalists!) to judge RF&#8217;s achievements? but when a another pro says anything, that&#8217;s ok&#8230; because they DO know what it takes to play tennis at the pro level&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dootsiez</title>
		<link>http://www.gototennisblog.com/2009/07/15/pete-sampras-thinks-roger-federer-is-the-greatest-maybe/#comment-7010</link>
		<dc:creator>dootsiez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gototennisblog.com/?p=10369#comment-7010</guid>
		<description>Ah silly me. Thought you said 10 slams, and went - woah! 

I was a true Fed hater for a while, and had be firmly camped on the Rafa&#039;s side of things. Then did a complete 180! 

Fickle I know, hehehe.... but I&#039;ve never been more wrong about a player initially as I was about Federer. Happy to admit my mistakes :D 

Fed&#039;s marketing did help. So people shouldn&#039;t just look at all the negatives, some of Federer&#039;s ads, clothes and appearances really have helped him get more fans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah silly me. Thought you said 10 slams, and went &#8211; woah! </p>
<p>I was a true Fed hater for a while, and had be firmly camped on the Rafa&#8217;s side of things. Then did a complete 180! </p>
<p>Fickle I know, hehehe&#8230;. but I&#8217;ve never been more wrong about a player initially as I was about Federer. Happy to admit my mistakes <img src='http://www.gototennisblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Fed&#8217;s marketing did help. So people shouldn&#8217;t just look at all the negatives, some of Federer&#8217;s ads, clothes and appearances really have helped him get more fans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freakyfrites</title>
		<link>http://www.gototennisblog.com/2009/07/15/pete-sampras-thinks-roger-federer-is-the-greatest-maybe/#comment-7005</link>
		<dc:creator>freakyfrites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 06:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gototennisblog.com/?p=10369#comment-7005</guid>
		<description>Wait, Dootsiez, you thought Roger was a bore??? WHAT? You weren&#039;t in love with him from the moment you saw him with his spotty face and ponytail???? WHA???

To be honest, I still remember one of the first times I watched Roger, he&#039;d just won Wimbledon and cried during the trophy ceremony: &quot;This is for all the people in BASEL!&quot; My husband and I cracked up and used that as our catch phrase for the rest of the summer.

Oh, Roger! Thanks for the memories! He&#039;s my GOAT, anyway.

Okay, back to the GOAT-talk. I said 9 or 10 &quot;more&quot; - so 15 or 16 total. I think if Rafa ties Roger or gets within a few slams he could be the GOAT. Consistency matters but in the end, does anyone remember consistency over big results? And Davis Cup and Olympic gold in singles ain&#039;t nuthin&#039; Then again, head-to-heads aren&#039;t that sexy either. Ack! This GOAT argument twists my brain. Which is why it&#039;s so fun.

But the big thing is that Rafa still has to win many more slams to even get close. And that&#039;s not easy and I shouldn&#039;t assume it&#039;s going to happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, Dootsiez, you thought Roger was a bore??? WHAT? You weren&#8217;t in love with him from the moment you saw him with his spotty face and ponytail???? WHA???</p>
<p>To be honest, I still remember one of the first times I watched Roger, he&#8217;d just won Wimbledon and cried during the trophy ceremony: &#8220;This is for all the people in BASEL!&#8221; My husband and I cracked up and used that as our catch phrase for the rest of the summer.</p>
<p>Oh, Roger! Thanks for the memories! He&#8217;s my GOAT, anyway.</p>
<p>Okay, back to the GOAT-talk. I said 9 or 10 &#8220;more&#8221; &#8211; so 15 or 16 total. I think if Rafa ties Roger or gets within a few slams he could be the GOAT. Consistency matters but in the end, does anyone remember consistency over big results? And Davis Cup and Olympic gold in singles ain&#8217;t nuthin&#8217; Then again, head-to-heads aren&#8217;t that sexy either. Ack! This GOAT argument twists my brain. Which is why it&#8217;s so fun.</p>
<p>But the big thing is that Rafa still has to win many more slams to even get close. And that&#8217;s not easy and I shouldn&#8217;t assume it&#8217;s going to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dootsiez</title>
		<link>http://www.gototennisblog.com/2009/07/15/pete-sampras-thinks-roger-federer-is-the-greatest-maybe/#comment-6988</link>
		<dc:creator>dootsiez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 01:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gototennisblog.com/?p=10369#comment-6988</guid>
		<description>Hmm I don&#039;t know about the &quot;Rafa winning 10 slams = undisputed GOAT&quot; argument. It would definitely put him in GOAT terrain, there&#039;s a lot of other things about Rafa that I don&#039;t think are in the same universe as Laver, Sampras or Federer: ASTOUNDING consistency for one. Can Rafa be GOAT with only 10 slams if he never achieved the same number of years as the No 1 in the world? semifinals in a row etc.? Or if Federer ended his career with 17 or 18 slams? Can you really pick a winning H2H over a difference of 7 or 8 slams, given these two are 5 years apart in age? I think Rafa will get to 10 slams though. Beyond that, depends on how his body holds up. 

&#039;Fed hater&#039; Topspin: hehehe agree. I think Fed needs a few slam wins over Top 4 opponents again to add weight to his records, not that his records don&#039;t weigh enough as they stand. 

It&#039;s slightly hard for him to actually play the top 4 though, as he keeps turning up to semifinals and finals to find the rest of the top 4 eliminated. It&#039;s not like we can make him play round robins with Nadal, Djokovic and Murray... 

As for Jacketgate, BAH! *crawls into a hole* 
I used to think Federer was the biggest bore before 2006. So do I think the whole clothes/gear focus by Nike was a marketing fail? no. Has it been overkill lately? yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm I don&#8217;t know about the &#8220;Rafa winning 10 slams = undisputed GOAT&#8221; argument. It would definitely put him in GOAT terrain, there&#8217;s a lot of other things about Rafa that I don&#8217;t think are in the same universe as Laver, Sampras or Federer: ASTOUNDING consistency for one. Can Rafa be GOAT with only 10 slams if he never achieved the same number of years as the No 1 in the world? semifinals in a row etc.? Or if Federer ended his career with 17 or 18 slams? Can you really pick a winning H2H over a difference of 7 or 8 slams, given these two are 5 years apart in age? I think Rafa will get to 10 slams though. Beyond that, depends on how his body holds up. </p>
<p>&#8216;Fed hater&#8217; Topspin: hehehe agree. I think Fed needs a few slam wins over Top 4 opponents again to add weight to his records, not that his records don&#8217;t weigh enough as they stand. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s slightly hard for him to actually play the top 4 though, as he keeps turning up to semifinals and finals to find the rest of the top 4 eliminated. It&#8217;s not like we can make him play round robins with Nadal, Djokovic and Murray&#8230; </p>
<p>As for Jacketgate, BAH! *crawls into a hole*<br />
I used to think Federer was the biggest bore before 2006. So do I think the whole clothes/gear focus by Nike was a marketing fail? no. Has it been overkill lately? yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freakyfrites</title>
		<link>http://www.gototennisblog.com/2009/07/15/pete-sampras-thinks-roger-federer-is-the-greatest-maybe/#comment-6981</link>
		<dc:creator>freakyfrites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gototennisblog.com/?p=10369#comment-6981</guid>
		<description>Hi lk28!

Good point about the head-to-head consisting of mostly clay court matches. And many of these have been in finals. If Rafa is the clay GOAT and Roger is consistently second best, that reflects quite well on Rog!

Like you, I&#039;m really looking forward to a healthy Rafa and a happy Roger meeting in more finals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi lk28!</p>
<p>Good point about the head-to-head consisting of mostly clay court matches. And many of these have been in finals. If Rafa is the clay GOAT and Roger is consistently second best, that reflects quite well on Rog!</p>
<p>Like you, I&#8217;m really looking forward to a healthy Rafa and a happy Roger meeting in more finals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freakyfrites</title>
		<link>http://www.gototennisblog.com/2009/07/15/pete-sampras-thinks-roger-federer-is-the-greatest-maybe/#comment-6980</link>
		<dc:creator>freakyfrites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gototennisblog.com/?p=10369#comment-6980</guid>
		<description>Wow, Joey! You must be getting your doctorate in G.O.A.T.ology! This is a really interesting argument. 

I often forget about the age difference between Rafa and Roger, mostly because both players are at peak mental and physical fitness. But there&#039;s no denying that they have come of age during different eras, and Roger&#039;s longevity and consistency has made the rivalry possible. It will be interesting to see if Rafa can enjoy a similarly long run at the top. It&#039;s hard to say right now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Joey! You must be getting your doctorate in G.O.A.T.ology! This is a really interesting argument. </p>
<p>I often forget about the age difference between Rafa and Roger, mostly because both players are at peak mental and physical fitness. But there&#8217;s no denying that they have come of age during different eras, and Roger&#8217;s longevity and consistency has made the rivalry possible. It will be interesting to see if Rafa can enjoy a similarly long run at the top. It&#8217;s hard to say right now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lk28</title>
		<link>http://www.gototennisblog.com/2009/07/15/pete-sampras-thinks-roger-federer-is-the-greatest-maybe/#comment-6979</link>
		<dc:creator>lk28</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gototennisblog.com/?p=10369#comment-6979</guid>
		<description>As I&#039;ve said here before, I don&#039;t like the GOAT argument:  too many variables.   That said, Roger has got to be up there.  I don&#039;t mind the H2H stats against Nadal.  Over half of those matches are on clay, where I&#039;m happy to admit that Rafa has the edge.  He&#039;s the GOAT on clay, without a doubt.  But during those years when Roger was losing to Rafa on clay, he was getting to the finals and winning against everyone else on grass and hard court.  Nadal often did not make it to the finals to challenge Roger on those surfaces. When he did, he usually lost.  The exceptions are 08 Wimbledon and the 09 Australian Open.  I think the most meaningful H2H matches will take place over the next two years, assuming both are healthy and playing their best.  Let the games begin!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I&#8217;ve said here before, I don&#8217;t like the GOAT argument:  too many variables.   That said, Roger has got to be up there.  I don&#8217;t mind the H2H stats against Nadal.  Over half of those matches are on clay, where I&#8217;m happy to admit that Rafa has the edge.  He&#8217;s the GOAT on clay, without a doubt.  But during those years when Roger was losing to Rafa on clay, he was getting to the finals and winning against everyone else on grass and hard court.  Nadal often did not make it to the finals to challenge Roger on those surfaces. When he did, he usually lost.  The exceptions are 08 Wimbledon and the 09 Australian Open.  I think the most meaningful H2H matches will take place over the next two years, assuming both are healthy and playing their best.  Let the games begin!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freakyfrites</title>
		<link>http://www.gototennisblog.com/2009/07/15/pete-sampras-thinks-roger-federer-is-the-greatest-maybe/#comment-6978</link>
		<dc:creator>freakyfrites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gototennisblog.com/?p=10369#comment-6978</guid>
		<description>FED HATER! (just kidding :) )

Top Spin, I agree that Roger needs to improve the head to heads against Rafa and Murray. Or maybe just one of them.

But I also wonder if it&#039;s true that every GOAT has one hole in his/her resume - maybe it&#039;s a clay phobia, or an opponent, or a lack of depth in their era. 

That&#039;s why Rafa makes such an intriguing GOAT prospect - he&#039;s mastered hard, clay and grass, he&#039;s won Davis Cup, he&#039;s won an Olympic Gold Medal - if he can find a way to win &quot;just&quot; 9 or 10 more slams he&#039;d be the undisputed GOAT in my opinion.

Of course, to even assume that this would be an easy task for him or any player is insulting to Rafa, Roger and all the other players. Just winning one is a titanic effort, as Roddick has shown in his efforts to win one more. So this Rafa thing is just speculation. And GOAT speculation is a totally different thing form GOAT identification.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FED HATER! (just kidding <img src='http://www.gototennisblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  )</p>
<p>Top Spin, I agree that Roger needs to improve the head to heads against Rafa and Murray. Or maybe just one of them.</p>
<p>But I also wonder if it&#8217;s true that every GOAT has one hole in his/her resume &#8211; maybe it&#8217;s a clay phobia, or an opponent, or a lack of depth in their era. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s why Rafa makes such an intriguing GOAT prospect &#8211; he&#8217;s mastered hard, clay and grass, he&#8217;s won Davis Cup, he&#8217;s won an Olympic Gold Medal &#8211; if he can find a way to win &#8220;just&#8221; 9 or 10 more slams he&#8217;d be the undisputed GOAT in my opinion.</p>
<p>Of course, to even assume that this would be an easy task for him or any player is insulting to Rafa, Roger and all the other players. Just winning one is a titanic effort, as Roddick has shown in his efforts to win one more. So this Rafa thing is just speculation. And GOAT speculation is a totally different thing form GOAT identification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freakyfrites</title>
		<link>http://www.gototennisblog.com/2009/07/15/pete-sampras-thinks-roger-federer-is-the-greatest-maybe/#comment-6976</link>
		<dc:creator>freakyfrites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gototennisblog.com/?p=10369#comment-6976</guid>
		<description>I agree! I love the Rafa/Roger rivalry and can&#039;t wait for them to meet again in a Slam final. I hope Roger&#039;s new confidence helps him improve that head-to-head - over Murray, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree! I love the Rafa/Roger rivalry and can&#8217;t wait for them to meet again in a Slam final. I hope Roger&#8217;s new confidence helps him improve that head-to-head &#8211; over Murray, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freakyfrites</title>
		<link>http://www.gototennisblog.com/2009/07/15/pete-sampras-thinks-roger-federer-is-the-greatest-maybe/#comment-6975</link>
		<dc:creator>freakyfrites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gototennisblog.com/?p=10369#comment-6975</guid>
		<description>Yeah, it&#039;s interesting to hear even Roger himself say he is most proud of that one stat: 20 consecutive Major semifinals. And Andy Roddick said in a recent interview that he thinks it&#039;s the only relevant stat in tennis. 

It&#039;s an &quot;insider&quot; argument, not the kind of thing you necessarily see in record books or that casual fans know about, but it&#039;s definitely a big part of the GOAT argument for Roger. Probably more so than Roger&#039;s hair :) I should have put it in my multiple choice list, above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it&#8217;s interesting to hear even Roger himself say he is most proud of that one stat: 20 consecutive Major semifinals. And Andy Roddick said in a recent interview that he thinks it&#8217;s the only relevant stat in tennis. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s an &#8220;insider&#8221; argument, not the kind of thing you necessarily see in record books or that casual fans know about, but it&#8217;s definitely a big part of the GOAT argument for Roger. Probably more so than Roger&#8217;s hair <img src='http://www.gototennisblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I should have put it in my multiple choice list, above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freakyfrites</title>
		<link>http://www.gototennisblog.com/2009/07/15/pete-sampras-thinks-roger-federer-is-the-greatest-maybe/#comment-6974</link>
		<dc:creator>freakyfrites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gototennisblog.com/?p=10369#comment-6974</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a good point. And right now I think the yardstick ends at 15!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good point. And right now I think the yardstick ends at 15!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.gototennisblog.com/2009/07/15/pete-sampras-thinks-roger-federer-is-the-greatest-maybe/#comment-6971</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gototennisblog.com/?p=10369#comment-6971</guid>
		<description>my thoughts exactly! the fact that Roger manages to dominate his era and arguably Nadal/Djokovic/Murray era is just another example of his greatness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my thoughts exactly! the fact that Roger manages to dominate his era and arguably Nadal/Djokovic/Murray era is just another example of his greatness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: girl from michigan</title>
		<link>http://www.gototennisblog.com/2009/07/15/pete-sampras-thinks-roger-federer-is-the-greatest-maybe/#comment-6961</link>
		<dc:creator>girl from michigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gototennisblog.com/?p=10369#comment-6961</guid>
		<description>Macden, you make a very good point. Consistency is very important.  Murray and (especially) Novak can get bounced from a tournament well before the finals.  Rafa, not so much, but still vulnerable.  Roger holds the record for making it to more slams finals then anyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Macden, you make a very good point. Consistency is very important.  Murray and (especially) Novak can get bounced from a tournament well before the finals.  Rafa, not so much, but still vulnerable.  Roger holds the record for making it to more slams finals then anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey</title>
		<link>http://www.gototennisblog.com/2009/07/15/pete-sampras-thinks-roger-federer-is-the-greatest-maybe/#comment-6960</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gototennisblog.com/?p=10369#comment-6960</guid>
		<description>My take on the Rafa argument is that Rafa and Roger are from two different eras, two different generations of players. There&#039;s a five year gap between them. Rafa just happened to be one of the earlier emergers of his generation which included Djokovic, Murray, Tsonga, Del Potro etc. When two players come up against each other on a number of occasions, over time the younger player is bound to have a better record against the older player. I doubt Rafa 2008 would have beaten Roger 2004-7 on grass or hard. You can&#039;t say the same about Sampras and Agassi, that would be like comparing Roger to Roddick or Rafa to Murray. Roger himself has a 1-0 head to head against Sampras which he got back in 2001. Does that automatically make Roger, way back in 2001, already better than Sampras? 

Roger Federer is the best player of his era, which contained the likes of Roddick, Hewitt, Safin and Ferrero. The fact that he could still compete, and beat, the players of the era after his just gives stronger evidence for the case of him being the GOAT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My take on the Rafa argument is that Rafa and Roger are from two different eras, two different generations of players. There&#8217;s a five year gap between them. Rafa just happened to be one of the earlier emergers of his generation which included Djokovic, Murray, Tsonga, Del Potro etc. When two players come up against each other on a number of occasions, over time the younger player is bound to have a better record against the older player. I doubt Rafa 2008 would have beaten Roger 2004-7 on grass or hard. You can&#8217;t say the same about Sampras and Agassi, that would be like comparing Roger to Roddick or Rafa to Murray. Roger himself has a 1-0 head to head against Sampras which he got back in 2001. Does that automatically make Roger, way back in 2001, already better than Sampras? </p>
<p>Roger Federer is the best player of his era, which contained the likes of Roddick, Hewitt, Safin and Ferrero. The fact that he could still compete, and beat, the players of the era after his just gives stronger evidence for the case of him being the GOAT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
